New flicks with celebs in interfaith relationships and from interfaith backgrounds, plus their baby news!Go To Pop Culture
Jewcy is making a quite a name for itself with its readiness to wrestle sacred cows. It helps when the staff is made up of some of the most talented, eloquent, innovative young Jews around.
This week, Senior Editor Joey Kurtzman goes toe to toe with Jack Wertheimer, provost of the Jewish Theological Seminary, the Conservative movement’s rabbinical school. Wertheimer has written extensively about the unwelcome demise of ethnocentric Judaism, a Judaism that is focused on Israel, internal socialization and helping other Jews, while Kurtzman, the product of intermarriage, is a proud defender of a catholic perspective that sees the suffering of Africans in Darfur as no less a tragedy than the suffering of Jews. And the notion of socializing with, or dating, only Jews? Both impractical and nearly “laughable,” he says.
Kurtzman launches the opening salvo by arguing that “American life has annihilated Jewish peoplehood.”:
But, Wertheimer argues, this notion of “reinvention” is a farce, a code for the obliteration of Judaism through “religious syncretism.” Of course, he can’t argue this without taking a shot at what he calls the “outreach industry”:
It seems to me that Wertheimer is misreading Kurtzman’s message. Kurtzman doesn’t argue that Judaism should be reinvented to incorporate Christianity or Buddhism, but that it should be reinvented to thrive in a pluralistic, secular American culture–and a larger world that is even more energetically pluralistic and secular. To pretend that Judaism hasn’t done this before is absurd; American synagogue architecture has always taken its cues from church architecture, the Jewish revivalist movement in the late 1800s followed a Christian one, Zionism was an outgrowth of a larger international movement towards nationalist identities. The largest Jewish movements in the country, Reform and Conservative, both are the creations of Jews who felt Judaism needed “reinventing.” But somehow, for Wertheimer, today’s demands for reinvention are akin to worshipping a Golden Calf. Kurtzman says Wertheimer has been called a “Cassandra”–one who predicts the future but is not listened to–but he should more appropriately be considered an ostrich.
The dialogue includes many more salient points–on both sides, I may add–and should be required reading for anyone who wants to understand the way modern American Jewish youth sees itself, and the way the previous generation sees Jewish youth.
Note: All comments on InterfaithFamily are moderated. Any comment that is offensive or inappropriate will be removed.